GitLab CI CD vs CircleCI vs Travis CI
Are you looking for the best Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) platform for your organization? You might have heard about GitLab CI CD, CircleCI, and Travis CI. However, choosing the right one can be a challenging task, especially when all three options have significant features and benefits.
In this comparison, we'll provide a factual and unbiased comparison of GitLab CI CD, CircleCI, and Travis CI.
GitLab CI CD
GitLab CI CD is an open-source platform that offers robust automation for continuous integration and continuous delivery. It is known for its comprehensive and flexible features, integrating easily with popular tools and services.
Advantages
- It has an easy-to-use interface that simplifies the configuration of pipelines and jobs.
- GitLab CI CD offers unlimited build minutes, unlike other solutions that come with restrictions.
- It has a wide range of integrations, including JIRA, Slack, and Docker.
Cost
- GitLab CI CD is an open-source solution available for free. However, some enterprise features come at a premium price.
Market Share
- According to SimilarTech, GitLab has a market share of 2.3%, as of September 2021.
CircleCI
CircleCI is a cloud-based CI/CD platform, providing automated workflows for building, testing, and deploying software. It is a popular choice among developers due to its ease of use and seamless integration with various third-party tools.
Advantages
- CircleCI's configuration requires only a few basic steps, making it easy to set up and use.
- It has an intuitive user interface that provides real-time updates, making it easy to track the status of builds.
- CircleCI's workflows are parallelizable, ensuring the fastest possible build times.
Cost
- CircleCI's pricing plans start at $30 per month for a single user. However, additional charges apply for extra storage and concurrency needs.
Market share
- As of September 2021, CircleCI has a market share of 6.11%, according to SimilarTech.
Travis CI
Travis CI is a CI/CD platform that allows developers to test and deploy their code quickly and confidently. It works with almost all programming languages and integrates with GitHub repositories seamlessly.
Advantages
- Travis CI's configuration process is simple, requiring minimal steps to get it up and running.
- It has a clean and easy-to-use interface that helps users manage build and deployment processes efficiently.
- Travis CI is excellent for open source projects, as it offers unlimited build minutes and concurrent builds.
Cost
- Travis CI's pricing plans start at $69 per month and are billed annually. However, open-source projects are free.
Market share
- Travis CI has a market share of 4.4% as of September 2021, according to SimilarTech.
The Comparison
In summary, all three CI/CD platforms offer a wide range of features and benefits that make them compelling choices for businesses.
- GitLab CI CD is an open-source solution with comprehensive flexibility that empowers organizations to scale their CI/CD pipelines.
- CircleCI features an intuitive user interface and the fastest build times due to its parallel workflow feature.
- Travis CI lets you test and deploy almost any programming language with its unlimited build minutes for open-source projects.
Here's a quick comparison of their pricing, market share, and some essential features:
Metrics | GitLab CI CD | CircleCI | Travis CI |
---|---|---|---|
Pricing | Open source, some enterprise features available | Starts at $30/user/month | Starts at $69/month, billed annually (Open-source Free) |
Market Share | 2.3% | 6.11% | 4.4% |
Build Minutes | Unlimited | Varies by plan | Unlimited (open-source projects) |
Job Parallelism | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Integrations | Lots of integrations, including JIRA, Slack, Docker | Integrates with most tools | Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc. |
Based on this comparison, we can conclude that selecting the right CI/CD platform depends primarily on your specific needs, desired features, and budget.
References
We hope that this comparison was helpful in making a decision based on facts.